Don’t miss Ken Greenberg’s opinion piece in the Toronto Star, July 8, 2026; if the Federal government delays quashing the BBTCA jets proposal, the resulting uncertainty will hurt the multi-billion Toronto Waterfront revitalization project because key investments won’t happen.

The WEBSA Concept Plan aims to address:
- Impacts of high water levels, flooding, shoreline erosion, property damage
- Breakwater disrepair and replacement
- Impact on water and land recreation programmes
- Martin Goodman Trail extensions
- Increased recreation opportunities - land and water
- Integration with Ontario Place
- Humber River deflector arm and beach improvement
- Provision for small craft availability and docking
Material from the old breakwall would be reused in constructing the new landmasses proposed (below).At the mouth of the Humber, a deflector arm is proposed to direct Humber River outflow further into Humber Bay to alleviate silting of the beaches.(This feature has been proposed by TRCA and Toronto Water for years. WEBSA has incorporated this feature, but it has been somewhat controversial.)Additional landfill at the base of the deflector arm, just east of the Humber outfall would house recreational facilities.
The section of breakwall from the Humber to about Sunnyside would be re-purposed to support a string of four islands, two of which would be connected to the shore and deflector arm with a series of pedestrian bridges integrated with the Martin Goodman Trail. The other two islands would be inaccessible by foot and remain "Habitat Islands".
Latest posts
Bob Rae talks with Steve Paikin on The Paikin Podcast about Billy Bishop Airport & other current issues. [Note: Bob Rae's remarks on Billy Bishop begin at the 24:10 min mark.] Click here to go to the video.
Recommending Sandford Borins' excellent blog post on the lessons for us today from the Pickering Airport debate and analysis in the 1970s:
In 1972, it was clearly understood that air traffic in Toronto was increasing, and it would be accommodated at either Pearson or Pickering. Both were seen as having a regional economic impact, in that Pearson would contribute to growth on the west side of Toronto, while establishing an airport at Pickering would shift some growth to the east of the city. Overall economic activity in the GTA would be the same whether Pearson was expanded or a new airport built at Pickering. This is different from the Toronto Port Authority and Ford Government refusing to acknowledge that, if Billy Bishop is not expanded, traffic will be accommodated at Pearson, and overall economic activity will be the same.